Bayesian Network Meta-analysis of Therapeutic Effect of Oral Chinese Patent Medicines on Coronary Artery Disease Complicated with Carotid Atherosclerosis / 中国实验方剂学杂志

ObjectiveTo compare the therapeutic effects of oral Chinese medicines （including Chinese patent medicines） on coronary artery disease （CAD） by the Bayesian network Meta-analysis. MethodThe randomized controlled trials of treating CAD with oral Chinese medicines were retrieved from the China National Knowledge Infrastructure （CNKI）， Wanfang Data， VIP， PubMed， Web of Science， Embase， and Cochrane Library from the inception to December 1， 2022. The Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool was used to evaluate the quality of the included articles. The direct meta-analysis was performed to compare the performance of oral Chinese medicines alone and in combination with Western medicine in the treatment of CAD in terms of intima-media thickness （IMT）， vascular endothelial function， plaque score， hypersensitive C-reactive protein （hs-CRP）， total cholesterol （TC）， triglyceride （TG）， high-density lipoprotein cholesterol （HDL-C）， low-density lipoprotein cholesterol （LDL-C）， and total response rate. Furthermore， the Bayesian network Meta-analysis was performed to compare the therapeutic effects of different Chinese medicines. ResultA total of 41 articles were included. The direct meta-analysis results showed that Chinese medicines combined with Western medicine outperformed Western medicine alone in recovering all the indicators of CAD. The Bayesian network meta-analysis yielded the following results. In terms of the total response rate， modified Huangqi Guizhi Wuwutang and Sanqi Huayu pills had obvious advantages over other Chinese medicines. In terms of IMT and plaque score， Xiaoban Huazhuo decoction， Yiqi Tongluo formula， Ruangan Jiangzhi capsules， and Guanxin Shutong capsules had obvious advantages over other Chinese medicines. In terms of blood lipid indicators， Shenqi Roumai mixture， Ruangan Jiangzhi capsules， Xiaoban Huazhuo decoction， Qiwei Sanxiong decoction， and Sanqi Huayu pills were superior to other Chinese medicines. The Chinese medicines above mainly had the functions of activating blood， resolving stasis， resolving phlegm， and dredging vessels. ConclusionThe combination of oral Chinese medicines and Western medicine is effective in treating CAD. Clinicians can use the drugs targeting abnormal indicators according to the results of this Bayesian network meta-analysis combined with the actual situation of patients to achieve better therapeutic effects.

Bayesian network Meta-analysis of traditional Chinese medicine injections combined with antiviral western medicine in treatment of influenza / 中国中药杂志

To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of traditional Chinese medicine injections combined with antiviral wes-tern medicine in the treatment of influenza by Bayesian network Meta-analysis. Four Chinese databases(CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, CBM) and three English databases(PubMed, EMbase, Cochrane Library) were retrieved by computer for randomized controlled trials(RCT) about the comparison between the combined administration of traditional Chinese medicine injections with antiviral western medicine(or with placebo) and the single administration of antiviral western medicine in the treatment of influenza, or the comparison between two different traditional Chinese medicine injections combined with antiviral western medicine in the treatment of influenza. The retrieval time was from the establishment of the databases to July 2020. Two researchers independently screen out the literatures and extracted the data according to the inclusion criteria and exclusion criteria. The included studies were evaluated by the Cochrane 5.1 bias risk assessment tool, and data analysis was conducted by ADDIS 1.16.8 and Stata 14.0. A total of 49 literatures about 5 061 cases were included finally, involving six traditional Chinese medicine injections, namely Reduning Injection, Xiyanping Injection, Tanreqing Injection, Yanhuning Injection, Qingkailing Injection and Shuanghuanglian Injection. The results of network Meta-analysis,(1)in terms of total effective rate, 6 traditional Chinese medicine injections combined with antiviral western medicine was better than antiviral western medicine alone. In terms of probability sorting, Shuanghuanglian Injection combined with antiviral western medicine ranked first.(2)There was no significant statistical difference in adverse reaction rate among all groups, but Reduning Injection ranked first in the probability sorting, due to the least side effects.(3)In terms of antipyretic time, Yanhuning Injection, Xiyanping Injection and Tanreqing Injection combined with antiviral western medicine was better than antiviral western medicine alone and Xiyanping Injection ranked first in the probability sorting.(4)In terms of cough relief time, Qingkailing Injection and Tanreqing Injection combined with antiviral western medicine was better than antiviral western medicine alone and Qingkailing Injection was superior to Yanhuning Injection. Qingkailing Injection combined with antiviral western medicine ranked first in the probability sorting.(5)In terms of the length of hospital stay, Xiyanping Injection, Tanreqing Injection and Reduning Injection combined with antiviral western medicine was superior to antiviral western medicine alone, and Reduning Injection ranked first in the probability sorting due to the shortest hospital stay. Because of the small quantity and low quality of included studies, the results of this study shall be regarded cautiously and comprehensively. In the future, multi-center, large-sample and clinical randomized controlled trials shall be conducted to verify the results.

Bayesian network Meta-analysis of Chinese medicine injections in treatment of chronic renal insufficiency / 中国中药杂志

In this study, Honghua Injection, Danshen Injection, Shenkang Injection, Shuxuetong Injection, Lulutong Injection, Shenxiong Glucose Injection and Chuanxiong Injection were compared for their clinical efficacy on chronic renal insufficiency by using the method of network Meta-analysis, with Western medicine as the common reference. The randomized controlled trial(RCT) of Hong-hua Injection, Danshen Injection, Shenkang Injection, Shuxuetong Injection, Lulutong Injection, Shenxiong Glucose Injection and Chuanxiong Injection for the treatment of chronic renal insufficiency were obtained by computer-based retrieval. The literature quality was evaluated by using the method in Cochrane Reviewer's Handbook 5.1 after independent screening of the included literature by two reviewers. The RJAGS package and GEMTC package of RevMan 5.3, GEMTC software, R software were used for statistical analysis to compare and sort the different injections in terms of efficacy. A total of 6 197 patients with chronic renal failure were included in 79 RCTs, involving 8 treatment measures. The effective rates of conventional treatment combined with Shenxiong Injection(OR=3.55, 95%CI[1.98, 6.37], P<0.000 1), Honghua Injection(OR=3.77, 95%CI[2.45, 5.81], P<0.000 01), Shuxuetong Injection(OR=6.71, 95%CI[3.30, 13.65], P<0.000 01) and Shenkang Injection(OR=4.14, 95%CI[3.42, 5.03], P<0.000 01) were all better than that in control group, and the effective rate of Honghua Injection combined with conventional treatment(OR=3.89, 95%CI[1.73, 8.74], P=0.001) was better than that in Danshen Injection combined with conventional treatment, all with statistically significant differences. By comprehensive comparison, Shuxuetong Injection, Honghua Injection and Shenkang Injection combined with Western medicine had good clinical effect on the effective rate, serum creatinine reduction and urea nitrogen reduction in patients with chronic renal insufficiency. However, due to the relatively low quality of the included literature, the conclusion has yet to be verified clinically.

Bayesian Network Meta-analysis of Therapeutic Efficacy and Safety of Chinese Patent Medicine Compound Preparation Combined with Conventional Therapy for Psoriasis Vulgaris / 中国药房

OBJECTIVE：To systematically evaluate the therapeutic efficacy and safety of Chinese patent medicine compound preparation combined with conventional therapy for psoriasis vulgaris ，and to provide evidence-based reference for clinical drug use. METHODS ：Retrieved from CNKI ，Wanfang database ，VIP，CBM，PubMed，the Cochrane Library and Web of Science ， RCTs about Chinese patent medicine compound preparation combined with conventional therapy versus conventional therapy in the treatment of psoriasis vulgaris were collected during the inception to Feb. 2020. After literature retrieval and data extraction ，the quality of the included studies was evaluated with risk bias assessment tool recommended by the Cochrane evaluation manual handbook 5.1. Bayesian network Meta-analysis was perfor med by using Stata 15.0 software，Addis 1.16.6 software and Markov Chain Monte Carlo method. RESULTS ：A total of 41 RCTs were included ，involving 4 122 patients. 5 kinds of interven- tion measures included Compound qingdai capsule ，Xiaoyin SF-010） granule， Keyin pill ，Yujin yinxie tablet and conventional therapy. Results of network Meta-analysis showed that in terms of improving the total effective rate ， compared with conventional therapy ，4 kinds of Chinese patent medicine compound preparations combined with conventional therapy could significantly improve the total effective rate （P＜0.05）；the results of network Meta-analysis were as follows ：Keyin pill combined with conventional therapy ＞Compound qingdai capsule combined with conventional therapy ＞Xiaoyin granule combined with conventional therapy ＞Yujin yinxie tablet combined with conventional therapy ＞conventional therapy. In terms of reducing psoriasis area and severity index （PASI）score after treatment ，compared with conventional therapy ，Keyin pill and Xiaoyin granule combined with conventional therapy could significantly reduce the PASI score （P＜0.05），while Compound qingdai capsule and Yujin yinxie tablet combined with conventional treatment had no significant difference （P＞0.05）；the results of network Meta-analysis showed that Xiaoyin granule combined with conventional therapy ＞Keyin pill combined with conventional therapy ＞ Compound qingdai capsule combined with conventional therapy ＞Yujin yinxie tablet combined with conventional therapy ＞ conventional therapy. In terms of reducing serum inflammatory factor level ，compared with conventional therapy ，Compound qingdai capsule and Xiaoyin granule combined with conventional therapy could significantly reduce the level of IL- 17（P＜0.05）， but Keyin pill and Yujin yinxie tablet combined with conventional therapy had no significant difference （P＞0.05）；the results of network Meta-analysis showed that Xiaoyin granule combined with conventional therapy ＞Compound qingdai capsule combined with conventional therapy ＞Yujin yinxie tablet combined with conventional therapy ＞Keyin pill combined with conventional therapy＞conventional therapy. In terms of safety ，there was no statistical significance in the incidence of ADR between 4 kinds of Chinese patent medicine combined with conventional therapy and conventional therapy （P＞0.05）；the results of network Meta-analysis showed that Compound qingdai capsule combined with conventional therapy ＞Xiaoyin granule combined with conventional therapy ＞Keyin pill combined with conventional therapy ＞conventional therapy ＞Yujin yinxie tablet combined with conventional therapy . CONCLUSIONS ：Compared with conventional therapy ，additional use of 4 kinds of Chinese patent medicine compound preparations can improve the curative effect of psoriasis vulgaris patients with blood heat syndrome ，and Keyin pill is the best ；Xiaoyin granule is the best in reducing the degree of skin lesions and serum inflammatory factors ；additional use of 4 kinds of Chinese patent medicine compound preparations show good safety ，and Compound qingdai capsule is the best.

Bayesian Network Meta-analysis of Therapeutic Efficacy of Xianling Gubao Capsules Combined with Routine Therapy for Postmenopausal Osteoporosis / 中国药房

OBJECTIVE： To systematically evaluate the difference of therapeutic efficacy of Xianling gubao capsules combined with routine therapy for postmenopausal osteoporosis （PMOP）. METHODS： Retrieved from Cochrane Library， PubMed， Embase， ClinicalTrials， CNKI， VIP， Wanfang database and CBM， clinical randomized controlled trials （RCTs） about Xianling gubao capsules combined with placebo and routine treatment （trial group） versus placebo and routine treatment or Xianling gubao capsules （control group） alone in the treatment of PMOP were collected. After literature screening and data extraction， the quality of included literatures were evaluated with Cochrane system evaluator manual 5.3 recommend bias risk evaluation tool. Bayesian Network Meta-analysis was performed with Stata 14.0 software  and Bayesian Markov Chain Monte Carlo. RESULTS： A total of 16 RCTs were included， involving a total of 1 360 patients and 3 intervention measures as Xianling gubao capsules alone， Xianling gubao capsules combined with routine treatment， routine treatment. Results of Meta-analysis showed that in respect of improving total response rate， compared with routine treatment， Xianling gubao capsules combined with routine treatment [OR＝0.28，95％CI（0.12， 0.64），P＜0.05]could significantly improve total response rate； network Meta-analysis ranking showed that Xianling gubao capsules combined with routine treatment＞Xianling gubao capsules alone＞routine treatment. In terms of increasing bone mineral density （BMD）， compared with routine treatment， Xianling gubao capsules combined with routine treatment [OR＝0.45，95％CI（0.24， 0.84），P＜0.05] and Xianling gubao capsules alone [OR＝0.78， 95％CI（0.32， 0.84），P＜0.05] could significantly improve BMD； network Meta-analysis ranking showed that Xianling gubao capsules combined with routine treatment＞Xianling gubao capsules alone＞routine treatment. In the term of improving serum calcium level， compared with Xianling gubao capsules alone [OR＝4.76，95％CI（2.14， 10.59），P＜0.05] and routine treatment [OR＝0.45， 95％CI（0.21， 0.99），P＜0.05]， Xianling gubao capsules combined with routine treatment could significantly improve serum calcium level； network Meta-analysis ranking showed that Xianling gubao capsules combined with routine treatment＞routine treatment＞Xianling gubao capsules alone. In the term of improving serum phosphorus level， compared with Xianling gubao capsules alone， Xianling gubao capsules combined with routine treatment [OR＝2.85，95％CI（1.81， 4.48），P＜0.05] and routine treatment [OR＝2.93，95％CI（1.76， 4.86），P＜0.05] could significantly improve serum phosphorus level； network Meta-analysis ranking showed that routine treatment＞Xianling gubao capsules combined with routine treatment＞Xianling gubao capsules alone. CONCLUSIONS： Xianling gubao capsules combined with routine treatment can significantly improve therapeutic efficacy of PP patients， increase BMD and serum calcium level after treatment， but routine treatment is the best in improving serum phosphorous level.

Bayesian Network Meta-analysis of Therapeutic Efficacy and Safety of Different Chinese Patent Medicine Injection for Pro- moting Blood Circulation and Removing Blood Stasis Combined with Routine Treatment after PCI / 中国药房

OBJECTIVE： To systematically evaluate the difference in therapeutic efficacy， safety and cardiac function of Chinese patent medicine injection for promoting blood circulation and removing blood stasis combined with routine treatment after percutaneous coronary intervention （PCI）， and to provide evidence-based reference for clinical drug use. METHODS： Retrieved from Cochrane library， PubMed， Embase， CNKI， Wanfang database and Chinese sci-tech periodicals database， RCTs about different Chinese patent medicine injection for promoting blood circulation and removing blood stasis combined with routine treatment （trial group） versus routine treatment （control group） after PCI were collected. After screening the literature and extracting the data， the quality of the included studies was evaluated by modified Jadad scale. Bayesian network Meta- analysis was performed by using Stata 14.0 software and Markov Chain-Monte Carlo method. RESULTS： A total of 15 RCTs involving 1 364 patients were included， involving Salvia miltiorrhiza injection， Puerarin injection， Yiqi fumai injection， Xuebijing injection， Shenfu injection， Shuxuetong injection， Salvia miltiorrhiza and ligustrazine injection， Rhodiola wallichiana injection， Danhong injection. Results of Meta-analysis showed that in the aspect of improving total response rate of ECG， 8 kinds of intervention measures were involved；compared with control group， 7 kinds of intervention measures could improve the total response rate of ECG of trial group except for Shenfu injection （P＞0.05）； network Meta-analysis ranking showed that S. miltiorrhiza injection＞Puerarin injection＞Shenfu injection＞S. miltiorrhiza and ligustrazine injection＞Shuxuetong injection＞R. wallichiana injection＞ Danhong injection＞routine treatment. In terms of reducing adverse cardiovascular events （MACE） incidence，8 kinds of intervention measures were involved； compared with control group， 7 kinds of intervention measures could reduce the MACE incidence of trial group except for Puerarin injection （P＞0.05）； network Meta-analysis ranking showed that S. miltiorrhiza and ligustrazine injection＞Danhong injection＞Xuebijing injection＞Shuxuetong injection＞S. miltiorrhiza injection＞R. wallichiana injection＞ Puerarin injection＞routine treatment. In terms of improving left ventricular ejection fraction （LVEF） after treatment， 8 kinds of intervention measures were involved； compared with control group， 7 intervention measures could significantly improve LVEF after treatment of trial group except for R. wallichiana injection (P＞0.05）； network Meta-analysis ranking showed that S. miltiorrhiza and ligustrazine injection＞Yiqi fumai injection＞Danhong injection＞Shenfu injection＞S. miltiorrhiza injection＞Shuxuetong injection＞R. wallichiana injection＞routine treatment. CONCLUSIONS： Compared with routine treatment， S. miltiorrhiza injection is the best in improving total response rate of ECG； S. miltiorrhiza and ligustrazine injection is the best in reducing MACE incidence and improving LVEF after treatment.

Bayesian Network Meta-analysis of Somatostatin and Protease Inhibitors for the Prevention of Post-ERCP Pancreatitis and Hyperamylase / 中国药房

OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the clinical efficacy of somatostatin and protease inhibitors in the prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis(PEP)and hyperamylasemia(PEHA). METHODS:Retrieved from databases as Cochrane Library, PubMed,Embase,RCTs about therapeutic efficacy of somatostatin and protease inhibitors in the prevention of PEP were included. EndNote X8 software was used to eliminate duplicate documents,and the quality of included studies was evaluated according to Cochrane System Evaluator Manual version 5.3.3. Bayesian network Meta-analysis was conducted by MCMC method with R 3.4.3 software Gemtc 0.8 program package. Risk of bias was evaluated by using Rev Man 5.3 software,and risk of publication was evaluated by using Stata 14.0 software draws funnel map. RESULTS:A total of 33 RCTs were included,involving 10 576 patients,somatostatin,gabexate,ulinastatin,nafamostat. Network Meta-analysis showed that in the prevention of PEP,the order of curative effect was as follows:somatostatin(intravenous bolus)>nafamostat>ulinastatin>somatostatin(high-dose intravenous drip)>gabexate,somatostatin(low-dose intravenous drip)was ineffective. In the prevention of PEHA,the order of probability being somatostatin(high-dose intravenous drip)>somatostatin(intravenous bolus)>ulinastatin. Only nafamostat was effective in preventing PEP in high-risk patients. CONCLUSIONS:Compared with somatostatin(low-dose intravenous drip)and gabexate,somatostatin(intravenous bolus)and somatostatin(high-dose intravenous drip),ulinastatin,nafamostat can more effectively prevent PEP. Nafamostat cannot prevent PEHA,but can prevent PEP in high risk patients.

Comparative Effectiveness of Biologic DMARDs in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients with Inadequate Response to conventional DMARDs: Using a Bayesian Network Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) extend the treatment choices for rheumatoid arthritis patients with insufficient response or intolerance to conventional DMARDs (cDMARDs). These agents have considerable efficacy compared with conventional DMARDs, but only a few head-to-head comparisons among these agents have been performed. The objective of this systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) was to compare the relative efficacy of Certolizumab with conventional DMARD to licensed bDMARD with cDMARD therapy for patients who failed to prior cDMARD treatment under the condition of the reimbursement coverage criteria in Korea. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted using MEDLINE and Cochrane library. Key endpoints were the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) responses of 20/50/70 at six months. Bayesian outcomes were calculated as median of treatment effect, probability of the best, Odds Ratio (OR) and probability that OR was greater than one. RESULTS: Compared with other bDMARDs, Certolizumab were associated with higher or comparable ACR response rates; in ACR20, the OR (probability of OR>1) was 2.08 (92.6%) for Adalimumab, 1.86 (85.7%) for Etanercept, 1.89 (79.5%) for Golimumab, 2.36 (92.1%) for Infliximab, 1.79 (87.0%) for Abatacept, 1.74 (80.8%) for Rituximab and 1.82 (86.8%) for Tocilizaumab. In ACR50 and ACR70, the ORs did not present significant differences. CONCLUSION: Certolizaumab with cDMARD was more effective or comparable than other bDMARDs in patients who failed prior cDMARD treatment.